Martin Damm vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Damm vs Ficovich analysis and find out who is favored!
Martin Damm vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Damm 1 - 1 Ficovich
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Damm has won 48.43% of points on their second serve, while Ficovich has won 51.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Damm, in recent form, has won 45.41% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ficovich has won 52.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.31% and 32.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Damm has saved 70.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ficovich has saved 55.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Damm has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 49/ 28), with Ficovich winning 52.78% (W/L 38/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Damm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 63/ 40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 41). Ficovich has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 311/ 212), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Damm has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 28/ 20), where as Ficovich has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Damm winning 1 times and Ficovich being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Damm winning 2 and Ficovich winning 2. The last match between Damm and Ficovich was at the Cary Challenger, 12-09-2022, First, Hard with Juan Pablo Ficovich getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Damm and Ficovich have played a deciding set 0 times, with Damm winning 0 times and Ficovich 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Damm winning 0, and Ficovich 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Damm has played against opponents with an average rank of 268.51 while Ficovich has played against players with an average rank of 288.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Damm has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ficovich has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Damm has converted 33.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ficovich has converted 44.6% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
179
Rank
175
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
226
Rank
125
High
27
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
Form
57% (135-103)
Career Total W/L
57% (356-271)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
58% (19-14)
$107,985
Career Prize Money
$243,335
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Martin Damm | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 22 | 21 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:29 | 1:36:29 |
1st Serve % | 57% (78/136) | 62% (73/117) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (60/78) | 71% (52/73) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (27/58) | 57% (25/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 30% (3/10) |
Return Points W% | 34% (40/117) | 36% (49/136) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(4) |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Martin Damm
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
7-5 6-3 |
Martin Damm
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Martin Damm | Juan Pablo Ficovich |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 58% (19/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) | 55% (41/34) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (333/340) | 52% (383/348) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 40% (2/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 63% (17/10) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 1.11 | 0.3 |
Aces Total | 365 | 108 |
DFs per game | 0.37 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 121 | 67 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:46 | 1:45:7 |
Avg Opp Rank | 325.7 | 267.88 |
1st Serve % | 59% (1283/2175) | 60% (1348/2235) |
1st Serve W% | 77% (992/1283) | 69% (929/1348) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (432/892) | 52% (461/887) |
BPs Won% Total | 34% (46/136) | 45% (95/213) |
Return Pts W% | 33% (688/2078) | 40% (916/2271) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 25% (1/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 57% (13/10) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (13/26) | 58% (19/33) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 31% (4/13) |
Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 67% (6/9) |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 100% (17/17) |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (17/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 13% (16/2) |
Martin Damm Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Martin Damm
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
5
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
8
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
51%
(
55 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
17
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
52%
(
27 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Martin Damm
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
13
Aces
18
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Zhizhen Zhang
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
87)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Martin Damm
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
90)
13
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H |
view more
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Jakub Paul
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
68 of
111)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Francisco Rocha
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
SF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefanos Sakellaridis
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Juan Bautista Torres
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
82 of
132)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
69 of
132)
119
Total Points Won
98
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more